A Warning About My Fine Sounding Arguments


October 17, 2017

Colossians 2:4-5

4 I tell you this so that no one may deceive you by fine-sounding arguments. 5 For though I am absent from you in body, I am present with you in spirit and delight to see how disciplined you are and how firm your faith in Christ is.


It is not entirely clear what Paul is talking about in this letter to the Colossians though he is clearly warning against false teaching. He is likely dealing with some form of Gnosticism, a heresy which didn’t discard biblical teaching but distorted it in dangerous ways.

Then and now, the greatest danger to the Gospel is not from outsiders or non-Christians, but from the insiders. Today’s false teachers aren’t the proponents of Scientology, rather they are Christian leaders who attempt to set aside the clear teaching of Scripture in favor of something more palatable to modern hearers— a.k.a. fine-sounding arguments.

Fine-sounding arguments abound all over the place and from very respectable teachers. I read them all the time. For instance, I hear Fr. Richard Rohr regularly eschew what he calls a dualistic mindset or binary thinking, as though there were not good and evil, light and darkness, and virtue or vice. He makes fine-sounding arguments, and what he is saying is not entirely false but it can be very misleading to a well-intentioned follower of Jesus. Another example would be Rev. Adam Hamilton and his “three buckets” approach to Scripture and how certain teachings of Scripture can be disregarded because they are no longer applicable or were never reflective of the character of God in the first place. Again, he makes plausible and fine sounding arguments about this, but they can be quite slippery and even deceptive.

Please understand, I am not questioning the faith of these teachers. I am certainly not leveling a personal attack against them. A person can be guilty of false teaching without falling into the full-on category of a false teacher. We must be generous in our posture toward others and yet we must also be discriminating about what we accept and embrace as orthodox teaching. Am I suggesting we disregard teachers like these? Not necessarily. I read both Richard Rohr and Adam Hamilton and find a lot of what they have to say helpful and even illuminating at times; however, I sift everything.

Furthermore, I do not set myself up as an authority when it comes to teachers like these I have mentioned. They are undoubtedly more learned and experienced than I, yet I have a duty to call it as I see it and trust that others will do with that as they see fit.

Finally, just because I might raise questions about different teachers and teachings does not mean I place myself above them. In fact, I put myself in their same category: frail sinners and fallible human beings. I am fully aware of my skilled capacity to craft a fine sounding argument that in the end may not pass muster. I fully expect my readers, be they advocates or detractors, to scripturally sift all I am saying and to invite the Holy Spirit to confirm it or call it into question. You who have been reading for any length of time know me by now and that I welcome feedback and push back. It’s one of the ways we love each other.


Abba Father, we thank you for your son, Jesus, who is the Truth, both in his words, his ways and his life. Grant me the gifts of a generous heart and a discerning mind when it comes to other people and their teaching. I want neither to mislead nor to be misled. I want to love in truth and to be truthful in love. We pray in Jesus name. Amen.


  1. When we find a “fine sounding argument” we consider suspect or specious how do we avoid leveling a personal attack against the teacher?
  2. Have you ever been deceived by a “fine sounding argument” that seemed true at the time but later proved suspect? How did you handle that?
  3. Have you come to grips with your susceptibility to be deceived? If not, do you recognize this is itself makes you highly susceptible to be deceived?

P.S. Take an extra minute if you have it today and check out this blog post by Timothy Tennent on the difference between a position and a posture and the need to be irenic in our disposition towards one another– especially when we disagree.

Join the Daily Text Facebook group here.

Subscribe to receive the Daily Text email.

Join the Daily Text Fasting Challenge here. Whenever you sign up, it will begin the following Tuesday.

J.D. Walt, is a Bond Slave of the Lord Jesus Christ. jd.walt@seedbed.com.


Farmer. Poet. Theologian. Jurist. Publisher. Seedbed's Sower-in-Chief.


  1. You hit at the heart of my conundrum about how am I now to deal with/relate to the local church. Up until very recently, my understanding was The UMC was a specific faith tradition, one branch of the Church universal. I now know it is mired down in a wide spectrum of theological morass that ranges from outright false teachings and false teachers who do not exhibit a Christianity I want any part of to good hearted people who are somewhat off track…..

    I recently saw this statement as a print to hang on the wall–“Raised on sweet tea and Jesus”. If only my “good Christian upbringing” was that basic and utilitarian. My biggest problem is way too much church and not enough Jesus/knowing who God is on Monday morning when I wake up and have to face life head on.

    As an adult in my mid-20’s, I initially started showing up at church on Sunday mornings thinking I would finally get some answers that would help me “get this right”. I now show up questioning why I show up at all… :0)